"The Splash Effect"
ZADOK PUBLICATIONS - Dr. C. R. OLIVER
November 1, 2016
This Newsletter may be watched in a video HERE.
ZADOK PUBLICATIONS MONTHLY NEWSLETTER
Introduction: November 1, 2016 "The Splash Effect" Just after returning from the Atlanta meeting, Brother David Waller and I were conversing, and in the course of the conversation, he related a "tidbit" that directed me to this subject. He said, "When Mary anointed Jesus' feet with oil and dried them with her hair; she reeked of the anointing oil and filled the room with the fragrance." He went on to say that what we do for Jesus has this same aspect for us. "We give glory and that glory covers us. It fills the atmosphere around us and changes our spiritual house." Immediately, the title, "Splash Effect," came to mind. I believe this same effect operates in the negative as well as the positive. One cannot sew discord without living with discord. One cannot judge another without being judged. One cannot defame another without facing defamation. Neither can one sew love and encouragement without love and encouragement surrounding him or her. The "splash effect" is operating all the time. In the Song of Solomon, the fragrance found in the following accounts was ordained to be, even though some confusion reigns as to who did what and when. Look for a moment, at the relevance of the anointing that comes into play between Jesus and His Bride.
Later, in describing His planting in the garden of her heart, she mentions the ingredients of the costly oil which grows in order to bring it forth at the proper time.
Flooding the three accounts of Jesus' anointings in the New Testament are derivatives from this Old Testament prophetic scene. I think the errors that have grown up regarding Mary's anointing, as well as others, is because there is a demonic effort (like with all truth) to defame what Jesus treasured. He knew the Song's prophetic words were for His burial anointing and that the three wise men's gifts were similarly misunderstood. It was not coincidence Song 1:12 pictures the King at a table, for Mary's anointing was in this type setting. Mary Magdalene, though, was never attributed as anointing Jesus. This is the first truth which comes to light in researching these events. Too whom, then, do the New Testament writers attribute this action? Let us look first in John's writings. It is necessary to begin with John 11 and move then to the actual event in John 12.
John sets the stage in one place and points to the next Chapter for the closer examination of the events itself. Notice several things that are not noted in his account. We assume it was Lazarus' house where Mary and Martha (his sisters) lived, since Martha is cited as serving those gathered there. I. Account of John:
John leaves out "the memorial" aspect of the deed. He also attributes the question of the "could have been sold and the proceeds given to the poor" only to Judas. The beautiful aspect of the "splash effect" is noted, however. Naturally, Mary is scented with the same oil she anointed Jesus with. Her hair was reeking of it. (Much ado has been made about her hair being loose in a society that did not allow uncovered hair and worn mostly braided.) Further, the fragrance had to be on her hands and body as well, for she was actively involved with the drying of His feet. The house was filled with the smell of the oil. It got on rugs, furniture, clothing, bedclothes-it was everywhere. You ask "why was this significant?" Again the answer is found in Song of Solomon when the Shulamite smelled of the fragrance of myrrh from His presence at her door. This identified her with Him. This even caused the evil watchmen to misconstrue her intent to find Him. His "fragrance of Identity" should be on all of us. His presence changes the atmosphere around His saints. Perhaps a good example would be Moses when he returned from the mountain. He glowed of the glory. II. Account of Matthew Matthew's account of the Anointing may or may not be the same as John's account. Matthew simply identifies her as a "woman." There are also several differences in the rendering which are worthy of note. Keep aware of them as you read the passage below.
A specific house belonging to "Simon, the leper" is designated. Why no mention of the servings of Martha? Why is there reference only to "a woman and not specifically of Mary?" In this account, the oil is poured on His head. No mention is made of feet and hair. All the Disciples are involved in the "indignant" role. Jesus addressed all of them as a unit without singling out Judas. Lastly, Matthew gives the "memorial" blessing that is not mentioned by John. Are both of these the same person? Is Matthew alluding to Mary Magdalene doing an anointing rather than Mary, Lazarus' sister? Are these accounts separate since one concentrates on the feet and another on the head and whole body? If the Disciples registered indignacy at one such event, why register such when another took place. Is Matthew using the "woman" aspect much as Jesus did in addressing His mother from the cross? There are similarities that lend "the same event" status, but there are enough differences to conclude two separate events, in which case the third account would round out and signify the three days in the tomb before the resurrection. Splash effect is really connected to this second text, however. The lasting quality of the event is guaranteed perpetuity both as referencing the "woman" but also the event. Jesus says the gospel message must include this event, and the woman connected to it, in order to be the complete gospel message. Yet, how many messages are preached as the total gospel and omit her memorial? III. Account of Luke: Again, there are significant differences in Luke's account that point to at least a separate anointing in his reportage. The huge difference is the "woman of sin," her actions and her point of forgiveness.
Luke 7 is rich plowing and one must read the whole of the chapter to garner the setting for this third account. Jesus had been in the city of Nain, where Jesus raised a dead man. Shortly after this visit, there arrived messengers from the imprisoned John the Baptist. In response, Jesus does many more healings and tells the messengers to inform John what they saw with their own eyes. Jesus then tells the crowd that John's baptisms were real and a part of the message he had from God. Tax Collectors, and many others, confirmed their baptism of repentance through him. The Pharisees did not honor him and thus were out of the will of God. It is one of those Pharisees who invited Jesus to his home.
Though the Pharisee's name was Simon, is he the leper? I don't think so. Is this event with an unforgiven female sinner the same as the women of the other two accounts? I don't think so. Are the disciples not present? Who is this sinful woman whom Pope Gregory the First (590-604 AD) said was Mary Magdalene? Is she the Magdalene? I don't think so! Review the text. Upon hearing that Jesus was in town, this unnamed woman came and stood behind Jesus while he was seated at the table. Bowed down with her repentance, she wept on his feet, anointed them with oil and dried her tears and oil with her hair. (Many believe she had lived as a prostitute. There were prostitutes in Israel, for Judah turned into visit one and had relations with a "pretend one." Jesus is of the line of the tribe of Judah.) The disobedient and rejecting Pharisee immediately judged the situation and insinuated that Jesus had just proven He was not a real prophet or He would have refused her oblation and rebuked her actions. Jesus was now, in his eyes, ceremonially unclean. Jesus had accepted the advances and touches of a defiled woman! Pharisees are like that; they see defilement everywhere and themselves as Temple Clean. Jesus took him to task. He asked permission to question him, and the Pharisee saw this as opportunity to "defend the faith." Jesus gave a parable. His example was one of a creditor with two debtors. One debtor owed a small debt and the other a handsome sum. The creditor forgave them both. Jesus asked the Pharisee a legal question. Who would have been the most grateful? Had he answered, "Both equally, for it was debt forgiven," he might have been ministered to. Instead, he answered, "the one with the most debt." Jesus then compared the actions of a "self righteous Pharisee" to a grossly sinful woman. This alone would have enraged the host. Jesus pointed out the respectful duty of the Pharisee and the unsolicited action of a grateful heart. She had faith to believe her actions would characterize her changed life. It did! Jesus accepted her offering of sincerity of heart and rebuked the Pharisee. The splash effect of service resulted in her forgiveness. There was no "go and sin no more." He knew she would not, for she had changed. He also knew the stubborn and rejecting nature of the Pharisee would not change, for he would continue to depend upon legalism for his support, not the opinion of what he deemed a false prophet. The support group who sat with him questioned, "Just who does He think He is, forgiving sin?" Hardened hearts have little regard for mercy and grace. The Pharisee could have been forgiven that day, but he admitted to no sin. He felt he was superior to the prostitute. His legalism cost him the continuation of the visit with Jesus. The party had been ruined and Jesus was free to leave. There is such a thing as "negative splash effect." The action of the Pharisee bled over into his guests and re-enforced their Pharisee-ism. It also prevented any of them of inquiring more from Jesus. The wall that was built between them and Jesus was self-imposed. Ministry departed when the woman departed. She walked out into freedom and light. They increased their darkness and ultimately damnation-though religiously correct. Her forgiveness gave her license to go out and encourage those of her companions to seek Him and change, while the Pharisees hardened their hearts. Mary Magdalene If Mary Magdalene was not either of the women cited above, just who was she? It was after the "sinful woman" event that the Bible reveals Mary of Magdalene. She was a woman of substance evidently because she and other women of means used their resources to support Jesus' ministry. The splash effect of those activities afforded her the first glimpse of the resurrected Savior. She stayed faithful during His teaching and healing ministry, the cross and His burial and was rewarded.
Nowhere is Mary Magdalene associated with the three accounts noted above. She is introduced in the eighth chapter of Luke, as one who had seven devils. Jesus cast them out and she was loosed and thankful. Speculation starts at this point, and church teaching assumes too much. First, we know that devils control action, but we are not told what her actions were. Some speculate mental illness, others sinful activities. Mental aberration can be equated to the Demoniac who tore things and could not be contained. He was never equated to be a charlatan or a rake, just a madman. He wanted to follow Jesus and tell the world his experience. He was told to tell his villager neighbors and was refused in his offer. Mary was made part of the team. Mary has been pictured as Jesus' favorite-above His other Disciples. Later church writings attest to everything from being a faithful supporter of ministry down to Jesus' consort who bore Him children. She was declared a Saint, made to be a prostitute who anointed Jesus in repentance, by the Romanists. She was posed as an example of doing Penance and serving the Catholic doctrines related to such. She supposedly was so remorseful that she went to another country and lived a hermit's life through 30 years of meditative contrition. She also has been declared the "composite Mary." Wherever "Mary" is named, she was the person alluded to. Her faithful ministry had its reward for her concern (John 20) which comes alive in Mark's account.
Like Isaiah, her hearers did not believe her report. But, that did not diminish the fact. One must go back to John's account in order to see the series of events surrounding her first privilege.
His voice made the difference! His assurance of continued favor was when He identified Himself along with her as going to God, the Father. Oh, I tell you it pays to serve the Lord. The splash effects will fragrance your life and saturate your being. The atmosphere changes because you enter a room. Conversation deepens when you are in the presence of those who have the same fragrance. Traditions bow before the power of "coming from His Presence." Heavenly beings rejoice when they smell your scent. You become the incense waved before the altar,
Your prayers change the course of time and nations. Your testimony bears weight because of the anointing upon it.
(For a review of the inaccuracies surrounding Mary Magdalene, simply go to Wikipedia and read the twisted things religion and speculation have proposed.)
Until Next month, Dr. Cosby R. Oliver, PhD. |
Zadok Publications
P.O. Box 132874
The Woodlands, Texas 77393
(936) 230-3543
Email: zadokbookstore@zadokpublications.com
On The Web: ZadokPublications.com
Paperback volumes may still be ordered through our website.
To see the currently available books from Amazon, click on the cover images below.
In Spanish:
In German:
To see the currently available books from Barnes & Noble, click on the cover images below.
In Spanish:
In German:
Last modified: 02/03/2019